Deep Down

Late blight’s chemical attack mechanism explained

Published online: May 29, 2018 Articles, Fungicide
Viewed 2011 time(s)

This article appears in the June 2018 issue of Potato Grower.

A team of international researchers headed by scientists from the University of Tübingen in Germany has deciphered the workings of a cytolytic toxin, which is produced by some of the world’s most devastating crop diseases. The cytolysin is manufactured by pathogens such as bacteria and fungi and can wipe out entire harvests if chemical protection is not used. The study—by researchers from Tübingen and their partner institutions in the U.S., France, Slovenia, Belgium and Japan, as well as Göttingen in Germany—may lead to ways of better protecting crops from such pathogens in the future. The study has been published in the latest edition of Science.

The Great Famine in Ireland claimed around a million lives and forced more than a million people to emigrate. It began with the failure of potato crops in 1845 and the following years due to potato late blight, caused by an oomycete called Phytophthora infestans. It quickly kills the infected plant and spoils the potato tubers.

“This pathogenic organism produces cytolysin, a veritable killer toxin,” says Isabell Albert of Tübingen’s Center for Plant Molecular Biology. “The organism’s goal is to kill the plant cells so that it can feed on the dead tissue.”

To this end, the cytolysin perforates the plant cell membrane, damaging it beyond repair, and the affected cells die.

Phytophthora infestans is not the only pathogen to use this tactic, Albert explains. So does Pectobacterium carotovorum, which primarily attacks roots; it is also the preferred mode of attack by the Botrytis fungus, which ruins fruit and vegetable crops. What was not understood until now was why these cytolysins severely damage some plant species while not affecting others.

“For example, cells of all kinds of cereals remain undestroyed by the toxin,” says Albert. “Pathogens such as the potato blight therefore do not harm cereals.”

The researchers have now shown that sensitivity to the cytolysin is dependent on a receptor in the plant cell that is significantly different in different types of plants. In both cases, it is a molecule chain of sugar residues and fats. But in plants such as potatoes and tomatoes, the chain is short, while cereals have a much longer molecule chain.

“This longer receptor apparently means that the cytolysin can connect with the receptor in wheat or barley, but cannot reach the cell membrane—and therefore cannot have its deadly effect,” Albert says.

Thorsten Nürnberger, who headed the study, explains that the characteristics of the different toxin receptors offer a significant potential application: “The plants which are sensitive to the cytolysin due to their receptor include a lot of weeds,” he says. This opens up the possibility of developing a natural herbicide on the basis of a microbial toxin, which would act very selectively—and therefore in a much more environmentally friendly way than common herbicides today such as glyphosate.

Another prospect arising from the study, Nürnberger says, is the development of new kinds of biological plant-protective chemicals. He says it is conceivable that special sugar molecules could be used to block the cytolysin toxin, preventing it from docking onto vulnerable plant cells. That could enable effective protection from attack by a range of deadly plant diseases, Nürnberger says.